The McDonaldization of Education Essay -- McDonaldization and Higher E

  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Education remains a cornerstone for society as it has for decades. Technology advances, the economy fluctuates, and politics change, but education remains, not only important but imperative for personal and social growth. Yet, as important as it is touted to be, the quality and purpose of learning is often lost in the assembly-line, manufactured process of education that exists today.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In a highly structured and economics-driven world, the educational system may be viewed as a machine designed to churn out future workers and employees. Like the fast-food industry, education has been standardized in an attempt to provide the comforts of efficiency, calculability, predictability, and control. In our aptly named McDonaldized society, aspects as important as quality are sacrificed in lieu of speed and profit. As far as education is concerned, however, this attempt to systemize and order something as complex as learning proves futile and detrimental to the basic tenet of enlightenment.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The standardization of the learning process proposes a simplified, singular approach to providing education to those who can afford it. Limiting material provided and lessons taught, tests, grading, function to create an easily controlled system. â€Å"Education† has been transformed and has come to connote â€Å"the transmission from a central source of knowledge to passive recipients† (McClellan. Online). However, the question remains whether this definition can actually suffice. The futility of a packaged education is put into context when it is realized that â€Å"meaningful learning, deep knowledge, collective wisdom and innovative action do not come from slick, pre-packaged course materials and efficient one-way transmission of information† but rather through the more complex idea called learning (McClellan. Online).   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Unfortunately, the purpose of the education system, as seen in most institutions of higher education, is in fact to instill in people the notion that they are incapable of learning. The standardization of education highlights the underlying assumption that people â€Å"cannot learn without a pre-determined set of institutionalized options forced upon them† (Kyhall. Online).   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   The view of education as a commodity, rather than a means for intellectual, spiritual, or interpersonal growth, results in most educators and teachers offering st... ...onal and social growth.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  The cost of McDonaldization is clear. In terms of standardizing education, the model is â€Å"anti-diversity, anti-creativity, and anti-democratic† (Kyhall. Online). As a whole, the consumption of the simple solution called education will not solve the problems. The modern world is much too complex to be solved in a single approach. Furthermore, education creates danger in the world by devaluing learning and dehumanizing people. Learning cannot be confined to formal allotments such as school or colleges, and in our changing times, it becomes even more imperative that education be not a product to sell but a tool to enlighten, a means to promote growth rather than division. This is the true purpose of education. And it does not come pre-packaged. Works Cited Gidley, J. and S. Inayatullah. Youth Futures: Comparative Research and Transformative Visions. (2002): 34. Kyhall. "The McDonaldization of Education" 15 Nov. 2012. Web. 28 Oct. 2014.    http://fundamentalsofsoc.edublogs.org/2012/11/15/the-mcdonaldization-of-education/ McClellan, Jock. â€Å"Metaphors, Words, and Models of a Wiser World.† The Swaraj Foundation. Web. 28 Oct. 2014.

Describe the Possible Effects of Two Major Unpredictable Life Events

Task 3 (p3)- Describe the influences of two predictable and two unpredictable life events on the development of the individual. Major life events- Predictable and unpredictable events Major life events can be positive and negative and can be unpleasant, frightening, confusing and unsafe at times. Unpleasant stuff happens to all of us wether its predictable or unpredictable by feeling in control and able to organise, learning to cope with changes in life, coping with a physical changes. Predicted events of a teenager: When a child is born they are predicted to move on with their life and live it the best possible way they can.Any major changes can influence development positively within their life, as they grow. When they start secondary school they would want to make new friends and cope with the changes that would come ahead of them, which is known as positive learning. However, there could be risks of stress because no-one might let him/her hang around with them or he/she don't fit in with any group which is painful and makes them feel lonely and anxious; sometimes worthless. Perhaps no one listens to them – then he/she feel that no one cares. This may not really be happening but it feels that way and it hurts.They may feel angry at the world and even stay away from the people you know which lowers their self-esteem and confidence in talking to other people again their anger would lead them to end up criticising themself. Thinking too much about it – which a lot of people do – can confuse the child as well, which is not healthy. Another positive learning, during a predicted event, can be when the teen has now become old enough to leave home and has achieved independence and to control thier own personal enviroment, but coping on your own isn't easy.Suddenly the teen don't feel that smart anymore. He/she can become anxious and handling daily stress can become very difficult for them. And if they have had bad experiences in the past (such a s abuse), leaving home can be a ‘last straw' and tip themselves over into difficulties in handling fears. Some even experience loss of family support depending on the reason leaving home. Unpredicted event of an adult: One of the down side of life is things that happen are sometimes not expected and are really hard to go through but some surprises

How To Protect Net Neutrality - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 816 Downloads: 6 Date added: 2019/04/11 Category Society Essay Level High school Topics: Net Neutrality Essay Did you like this example? Protecting Net Neutrality Americans should demand protection for the freedom of information in 2018. Because net neutrality is essential for education, and communication. Since the introduction of the World Wide Web in 1989 countless opportunities grew expanding the wonders of its technology. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "How To Protect Net Neutrality?" essay for you Create order Just as the Internet grew also did the corporate greed to monetize its use and thus Verizon, Comcast, and Time Warner Cable were created. The various companies began to grab for sole proprietary rights to charge Americans for which services they could use online. The Federal Communications Commissions (FCC) proposed net neutrality rules during their 2010 Open Internet Order, comprised of four core principles: transparency, no blocking, no unreasonable discrimination, and reasonable network management. These rules were later shut down by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which stated that the FCC has limited regulatory options for broadband as an information service. During a five-month period in 2014, the FCC requested the publics opinion on the net neutrality issue and received nearly four million comments. February 2015, the FCC introduced new open internet rules, they were soon challenged yet again in court. Since the 2016 elections the FCC has switch ed into the hands of Republicans who wish to dismantle the regulations made by the Obama administration and create a free-market approach. One of the flaws in the concept lies at the heart of the net neutrality debate, that is an institutional design problem: finding and implementing a set of governance mechanisms that protect the benefits of the Internet as its technological, economic, and political conditions continue to evolve. Attaining an effective and sustainable governance approach requires sufficient agreement among stakeholders about the objectives to be realized and about the working of the system to be governed. The most prevalent way in which the debate is separated is by political interests, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) having the power to influence regulations in their favor. The other is economic gain, this can be either from the ISPs charging Content Providers (CPs) such as Netflix, YouTube, and Hulu premiums for higher speeds or priority over other CPs, another party that benefits from lesser regulations are the stockholders and investors behind ISPs. Verizon one of the nations largest ISP has been repeatedly caught throttling CPs network speed impeding the end-user from enjoying their entertainment; one of the largest instances of this being Netflix having their bandwidth reduced despite paying Verizon for higher bandwidth so end-users (customer) can enjoy their content loading faster and in full HD. A no blocking rule would prevent network operators from prohibiting use or access to certain devices, applications, and services. It would be subject to properly defined exemptions for security reasons and other legitimate purposes. Furthermore, a no blocking rule would allow other types of network management, including usage-based pricing. A zero-price rule would prohibit ISPs from charging CPs for the termination of traffic to users. Another key reason to maintain a sustainable governance over the Net, is with the rise of new technological developments also come ways that can endanger our livelihoods and safety. Deep Packet Inspection (DPI) an ability that was developed to examine the content of each individual datagram sent. This capability not only allows the filtering of malicious traffic but also the identification of the sender, content, and recipient of the packet, leaving open the potential to discriminate against competitors and political opponents. Without proper regulation countless Americans could be at risk of having their data stolen, resulting in credit card theft, identity fraud, and money stolen from their online bank account. Addressing the challenges raised in the net neutrality debate requires first a clarification of the overarching values that should govern the Internet. Many of these values took shape during the formative years of the Internet. They emerged from repeated interactions and choices made by the computer scientists, software designers, engineers, and users involved in the development of the Internet. It is important to bring these dimensions into open deliberation so that they do not influence the discussion as unexamined tacit premises. Contributors to the net neutrality debate draw from several, sometimes incommensurable, normative traditions. Discussions among legal experts, communication scholars, and political scientists emphasize human rights, political freedoms, and creative freedoms as important rationales for policies in support of an open Internet. Economists and engineers tend to start from efficiency considerations, with some overlap with respect to innovation arguments. Philo sophy and jurisprudence provide frameworks to assess implications of institutional and governance arrangements for justice, equity, and fairness. Visions of the economic, social, and political benefits of communication technologies have inspired engineers, scholars, and activists since the early days of electronic communications. In a broader historical perspective, the Internet is the latest and most powerful technology of freedom with potentially far-reaching effects on human and political rights. Freedom of speech online requires the ability for users to access the Internet and to communicate their thoughts and viewpoints online.